10 Best Rollup-as-a-Service Platforms in 2026

In this article, I will review the Best Rollup-as-a-Service Platforms and compare the top providers by rollup stack support, L2/L3, ease of deployment, data availability, sequencing, customization, security, pricing, developer tooling. This guide assists developers, start-ups, enterprises, and Web3 projects in identifying the right platform to efficiently launch scalable and application-specific blockchain networks in 2026.

What Are Rollup-as-a-Service Platforms?

Rollup-as-a-Service (RaaS) platforms are infrastructure services that help developers, startups, protocols and enterprises to launch and operate custom blockchain rollups without having to build the entire infrastructure stack from scratch.

They usually abstract away things like rollup deployment, node management, sequencing, data availability configuration, RPC access, monitoring, upgrades, and interoperability.

Providers have the ability to deploy L2 or L3 networks on frameworks like OP Stack, Arbitrum Orbit, Polygon CDK or ZK-based stacks. RaaS platforms abstract technical and operational complexities so that development teams can focus more on their applications while the provider manages much of the underlying blockchain infrastructure.

Why Choose Rollup-as-a-Service Platforms

Rollup Deployment Faster: RaaS platforms make it easier to launch an L2 or an L3, reducing the infrastructure and engineering work that’s required to build a rollup from scratch.

Reduced Infrastructure Complexity: Many operational aspects such as nodes, sequencers, RPC infrastructure, monitoring, upgrades, and network maintenance are handled by providers, reducing the burden on internal DevOps teams.

Flexibility of L2 and L3: There are many platforms that support multiple rollup architectures, allowing projects to choose the environment that best fits their application’s performance, security, scalability, and customization needs.

Custom Blockchain Environments: Teams can spin up app-specific networks with configurable parameters such as gas settings, transaction limits, sequencing models, bridges, and even custom gas tokens.

Data Availability Options: Depending on the stack and provider, projects can have access to different data availability solutions to help them balance security, performance, availability and operating costs.

Developer tools included: Some platforms package the rollup deployment with RPCs, block explorers, bridges, indexing, monitoring, wallets, automation and other services, reducing the number of infrastructure vendors needed.

Security and Operations: Managed RaaS infrastructure can provide monitoring, redundancy, upgrade management and operational support, helping production teams to run reliable blockchain networks.

Lower Development Expenses: Projects can outsource large portions of the infrastructure workload to a specialized provider, rather than having to hire and maintain a large infrastructure team to run each rollup component.

Focus on Application Development: Developers are able to spend more time building their DeFi protocols, games, payments applications, consumer products, or enterprise use cases instead of maintaining blockchain infrastructure by outsourcing infrastructure operations.

Key Points

Platform	Key Point
Caldera	Provides Rollup-as-a-Service infrastructure focused on custom rollup deployment and interoperability through its Metalayer ecosystem.
Conduit	Offers managed rollup infrastructure with integrated tooling for RPC, indexing, sequencer operations, and chain management.
AltLayer	Delivers Rollup-as-a-Service solutions supporting multiple rollup stacks and restaked rollup infrastructure.
Gelato	Provides appchain and rollup deployment infrastructure alongside automation, relay, and Web3 cloud services.
Alchemy Rollups	Enables developers to launch and manage custom rollups using managed blockchain infrastructure and developer tooling.
Zeeve RaaS	Offers managed rollup deployment, node infrastructure, and operational support for Web3 projects.
Chainstack	Provides infrastructure services that support rollup deployment, node management, and blockchain operations.
QuickNode Rollups	Delivers rollup infrastructure and developer tools for launching scalable blockchain networks.
Gateway.fm	Offers decentralized rollup and appchain infrastructure services for blockchain ecosystems.
Ankr AppChains	Provides dedicated blockchain and rollup infrastructure designed for Web3 applications and enterprise deployments.

1. Caldera

Caldera is a Rollup-as-a-Service provider founded in 2022, focused on customizable, application-specific L2 and L3 networks. It supports OP Stack, Arbitrum Orbit and Polygon CDK, offering teams optimistic and ZK-focused deployment paths. Its infrastructure supports configurable data availability options and managed sequencer operations.

The idea behind deployment is to reduce engineering effort, as Caldera handles nodes, bridges, monitoring and operational maintenance. L2/L3 support means it is the perfect choice for gaming, DeFi and dedicated application chains. Pricing is typically tailored to architecture, throughput, infrastructure and support needs, not a single, public RaaS rate.

Caldera Features, Pros & Cons

Features	Details
Multi-Stack Support	Supports major rollup frameworks including OP Stack, Arbitrum Orbit, and Polygon CDK, giving projects multiple architectural paths.
L2/L3 Deployment	Designed for dedicated application-specific rollups and chains, suitable for gaming, DeFi, consumer applications, and specialized ecosystems.
Data Availability	Supports configurable DA options, including Ethereum blobs and modular DA integrations such as Celestia and EigenDA.
Sequencing	Provides managed sequencing infrastructure while allowing projects to build more customized sequencing arrangements.
Interoperability	Caldera Metalayer provides an important differentiation for connecting application-specific chains and facilitating cross-chain communication.
Deployment	Managed deployment reduces the need for teams to independently operate the complete rollup infrastructure stack.

Pros	Cons
Broad rollup-stack flexibility	Greater architectural choice can increase configuration complexity
Strong application-chain focus	Custom production requirements may require commercial discussions
Metalayer interoperability	Teams should evaluate the exact interoperability model needed
Managed infrastructure	Less infrastructure control than running the stack independently
Suitable for L2/L3 projects	Final costs can vary substantially by architecture and usage

2. Conduit

Founded in 2023, Conduit offers managed infrastructure for teams deploying dedicated blockchain networks and application-specific rollups. The main L2/L3 support is for OP Stack and Arbitrum Orbit, giving projects a choice of the leading Ethereum scaling solutions.

Conduit is heavily focused on simplifying production deployments, infrastructure operations, sequencing, and ongoing upgrades. It can use Ethereum-based data availability and choose modular DA integrations in its supported environments.

Deployment is for teams that want a production chain, but don’t want to run all the infrastructure components themselves. The pricing & cost structure is generally based on the selected chain configuration and operational requirements. Enterprise deployments generally require a custom quote.

Conduit Features, Pros & Cons

Features	Details
Rollup Infrastructure	Provides managed infrastructure for launching and operating custom rollups and blockchain networks.
Stack Support	Strongly associated with OP Stack and Arbitrum Orbit deployments, giving developers established optimistic-rollup options.
RPC Infrastructure	Goes beyond initial chain deployment with managed RPC infrastructure and multi-chain access.
Indexing	Provides indexing capabilities alongside rollup infrastructure, reducing the number of separate infrastructure providers required.
Marketplace	Its broader platform approach includes ecosystem and marketplace tooling for applications running around deployed chains.
Operations	Provides operational tooling such as monitoring and infrastructure management for production chains.

Pros	Cons
Strong production-chain infrastructure	Less stack diversity than some multi-stack competitors
Rollup, RPC, and indexing in one platform	Broader platform can be unnecessary for simple deployments
Good fit for production applications	Pricing depends on deployment and infrastructure requirements
Simplifies operational management	Teams still need to understand underlying chain architecture
Established OP Stack ecosystem	Custom requirements may require additional evaluation

3 AltLayer

AltLayer is a modular blockchain infrastructure provider founded in 2022 that offers Rollup-as-a-Service and its broader rollup ecosystem. It offers L2/L3 support with OP Stack, Arbitrum Orbit, Polygon CDK, and ZK-oriented infrastructure for flexibility in app-specific chains.

What makes AltLayer different is its emphasis on restaked infrastructure and modular security components. Deployment hides much of the operational complexity of launching and operating rollups.

Data availability options that are supported are Ethereum and modular providers, depending on architecture. Pricing & cost structure is dependent on deployment needs, infrastructure resources and selected services, so production projects should expect customized commercial terms rather than a single fixed price.

AltLayer Features, Pros & Cons

Features	Details
Multi-Stack Architecture	AltLayer supports multiple rollup stacks, settlement layers, DA layers, and interoperability systems rather than forcing developers into one architecture.
Restaked Rollups	Its RaaS offering includes AVS-based components for decentralized sequencing, state verification, and faster finality.
AVS Components	VITAL focuses on verification, MACH on fast finality, and SQUAD on decentralized sequencing.
No-Code Deployment	Its dashboard allows users to configure execution-layer parameters without building the infrastructure manually.
Customization	Developers can configure parameters such as sequencer count, block gas limits, gas tokens, bridges, and RPC providers.
Rollup Flexibility	Suitable for teams that want modular infrastructure and the ability to combine different components.

Pros	Cons
Highly modular architecture	More choices can make architecture selection complicated
Restaked rollup infrastructure	Additional AVS components introduce additional technical considerations
Decentralized sequencing option	Not every application requires decentralized sequencing
No-code deployment	Advanced deployments may still require specialist engineering
Strong customization	Commercial and operational costs vary by configuration

4. Gelato

Gelato, launched in 2021, is Rollup-as-a-Service combined with the broader Web3 infrastructure of automation, relayers, RPC services and wallet tooling. Its L2/L3 support includes OP Stack, Arbitrum Orbit and Polygon CDK.

Its platform is built for customizable application-specific chains. This allows developers to deploy managed rollup infrastructure and set chain parameters without building the entire operational stack themselves.

Gelato also offers post-launch services such as transaction automation and blockchain infrastructure. Pricing & cost structure is dependent on the selected RaaS configuration and additional infrastructure services. Its main advantage is the combination of rollout deployment with an existing Web3 service ecosystem.

Gelato Features, Pros & Cons

Features	Details
RaaS + Web3 Infrastructure	Gelato combines rollup infrastructure with broader services such as automation, relaying, and blockchain development infrastructure.
Application Chains	Designed for projects that want dedicated application-specific blockchain environments.
Automation	Its automation infrastructure can be useful for applications requiring recurring or event-driven on-chain transactions.
Relaying	Relayer infrastructure can support transaction abstraction and smoother application interactions.
Account Abstraction	Gelato’s wider infrastructure ecosystem makes it suitable for projects integrating smart-account and gas-management functionality.
Deployment	Managed infrastructure reduces the operational burden of launching and maintaining a dedicated chain.

Pros	Cons
Strong Web3 infrastructure ecosystem	Broader ecosystem may be unnecessary for a pure RaaS requirement
Automation and relaying available	Architecture should be evaluated separately from auxiliary services
Good fit for application chains	Pricing can depend on multiple infrastructure components
Supports developer-focused infrastructure	More services mean more configuration decisions
Useful for account-abstraction applications	Teams should verify exact stack availability for their deployment

5. Alchemy Rollups

Founded in 2017, Alchemy provides Alchemy Rollups to teams that want to launch dedicated optimistic rollups that come with managed infrastructure. The supported rollup framework today is Arbitrum Nitro/Orbit which is more specialized than providers offering multiple stacks options. The service is designed for rapid deployment, and Alchemy says rollups can be created in minutes without any code.

L2/L3 support thus works best where projects select the Arbitrum ecosystem rather than require broad framework portability. RPC, APIs, wallets, developer tooling are all part of alchemy’s larger infrastructure. Pricing & cost structure General Alchemy infrastructure pricing includes Free, Pay-as-you-go and Enterprise plans. Rollup deployments may have custom commercial requirements.

Alchemy Rollups Features, Pros & Cons

Features	Details
Arbitrum-Based Deployment	Alchemy Rollups is closely associated with Arbitrum’s rollup technology, making it suitable for teams seeking an Arbitrum-oriented deployment path.
Fast Deployment	The platform emphasizes simplified rollup creation rather than requiring developers to assemble every infrastructure component manually.
RPC Infrastructure	Benefits from Alchemy’s broader blockchain API and RPC infrastructure ecosystem.
Developer Tooling	Teams can combine rollup infrastructure with Alchemy’s existing developer APIs and blockchain services.
L2 Focus	Its positioning is particularly relevant to application teams seeking dedicated Ethereum scaling infrastructure rather than a highly experimental multi-stack environment.
Managed Infrastructure	Infrastructure operations are abstracted so developers can focus more heavily on application development.

Pros	Cons
Strong developer infrastructure ecosystem	More limited architectural choice than multi-stack RaaS providers
Arbitrum-oriented technology	Not ideal if a project requires several unrelated rollup frameworks
Simplified deployment	Advanced customization should be checked against project requirements
Access to Alchemy tooling	Some teams may not need the broader Alchemy ecosystem
Suitable for Ethereum-focused applications	Commercial terms can depend on deployment requirements

6. Zeeve RaaS

Zeeve, which began its infrastructure operations in 2020 and RaaS work in 2023, offers managed blockchain infrastructure for application-specific networks. Its L2/L3 support covers architectures like Arbitrum Orbit, OP Stack, Polygon CDK, and ZK Stack as well as general blockchain deployment.

The platform includes configurable infrastructure, monitoring and easy chain provisioning for enterprises and Web3 applications. Hence, supported rollup stacks can fulfilll both optimistic and ZK-oriented needs depending on the architecture selected.

Zeeve simplifies deployment by abstracting infrastructure provisioning and operational management. Pricing and cost structure are based on chain architecture, infrastructure resources, throughput, and enterprise requirements. Larger production deployments generally require custom pricing.

Zeeve RaaS Features, Pros & Cons

Features	Details
Enterprise Infrastructure	Zeeve focuses strongly on managed blockchain infrastructure for organizations deploying and operating production blockchain systems.
Multi-Architecture Approach	Supports multiple blockchain and rollup environments, making it suitable for organizations evaluating different deployment architectures.
L2/L3 Infrastructure	Can be used for application-specific networks and Layer-2-oriented deployments depending on the selected technology stack.
Automation	Infrastructure provisioning and network operations are designed to reduce manual DevOps requirements.
Monitoring	Production infrastructure includes operational monitoring and management capabilities.
Enterprise Orientation	Its positioning is particularly relevant to organizations requiring managed infrastructure and operational support.

Pros	Cons
Strong enterprise positioning	Enterprise-focused deployments may be more complex
Broad blockchain infrastructure experience	Buyers should verify exact rollup-stack availability
Managed deployment and operations	Custom configurations may require a tailored engagement
Useful for production networks	Not necessarily the simplest choice for small experimental projects
Infrastructure automation	Cost depends on network architecture and operational requirements

7. Chainstack

Founded in 2018, Chainstack is more of a managed blockchain infrastructure and node provider than a typical RaaS specialist. It has production-ready access to blockchain nodes, RPC infrastructure, dedicated nodes and the ability to self-host, which is its power.

L2/L3 support is mainly through its large network infrastructure, not a proprietary rollup framework. Developers are able to build or run applications on supported Layer-1 and Layer-2 ecosystems using Chainstack infrastructure.

Easy deployment – Managed infrastructure, monitoring, scaling and node management * Pricing & cost structure: * Relatively transparent, with Developer, Growth, Pro, Business, and Enterprise options. Published plans range from free usage to paid infrastructure and custom enterprise configurations.

Chainstack Features, Pros & Cons

Features	Details
Managed Blockchain Infrastructure	Chainstack is primarily a managed blockchain infrastructure platform rather than a pure-play RaaS provider.
Node Infrastructure	Provides managed nodes and RPC infrastructure across numerous blockchain networks.
Dedicated Infrastructure	Developers can select infrastructure configurations appropriate for different performance and reliability requirements.
Developer Access	APIs and managed endpoints simplify access to blockchain networks without requiring teams to operate their own nodes.
Scaling	Infrastructure can be scaled according to application requirements and traffic.
Pricing Model	Chainstack uses plan-based and usage-oriented infrastructure pricing, with enterprise options for larger requirements.

Pros	Cons
Broad blockchain network coverage	Not as RaaS-focused as Caldera or Conduit
Strong managed-node infrastructure	Rollup customization depends on the underlying network
Developer-friendly APIs	Teams launching a completely new rollup may need additional infrastructure
Flexible infrastructure options	Pricing can increase with usage
Enterprise support available	Better suited to infrastructure access than highly customized rollup architecture

8. QuickNode Rollups

Founded in 2017, QuickNode added its Rollups-as-a-Service offering to its broader blockchain infrastructure platform. QuickNode Rollups supports OP Stack, Arbitrum Orbit and ZK-rollup technologies, giving projects several major options for deploying scalable networks. Its L2/L3 support is thus much wider than a provider with a single rollup framework.

Deployment simplifies infrastructure complexity by combining rollup services with QuickNode’s existing RPC and node infrastructure. The platform is especially optimized for teams building with QuickNode’s developer ecosystem. Pricing & cost structure depends on the rollup infrastructure chosen, usage and operational requirements, and production setups generally require commercial terms specific to the project.

QuickNode Rollups Features, Pros & Cons

Features	Details
Rollup Infrastructure	QuickNode extends its established blockchain infrastructure platform into rollup deployment and custom-chain services.
Developer Ecosystem	Projects can benefit from QuickNode’s broader RPC, node, API, and blockchain development infrastructure.
Multiple Frameworks	QuickNode’s RaaS ecosystem covers major rollup technologies and custom-chain frameworks.
Infrastructure Management	Managed services reduce the need for developers to operate every rollup component themselves.
Scalability	QuickNode’s existing infrastructure focus makes it suitable for applications expecting substantial RPC and transaction demand.
Developer Experience	Particularly attractive for teams already using QuickNode infrastructure and wanting to extend into dedicated chain deployment.

Pros	Cons
Large blockchain infrastructure ecosystem	Rollup requirements should be evaluated separately from RPC needs
Strong developer tooling	Pricing depends on infrastructure and usage
Managed infrastructure	Advanced customization may require specific configuration
Good RPC ecosystem	Not every project needs its broader infrastructure suite
Suitable for scaling applications	Custom production deployments may require enterprise engagement

9. Gateway.fm

Founded in 2021, Gateway.fm is a modular blockchain infrastructure that enables teams to launch and operate application-specific networks. Its RaaS approach abstracts away the infrastructure requirements that would otherwise take dedicated DevOps engineering, making it easier to deploy rollups.

L2/L3 support can be built on modular rollup architectures and Ethereum scaling needs, with the platform providing managed infrastructure and operational tooling. A major benefit is the ease of deployment, as teams can shift much of the management of the technical infrastructure.

The ultimate architecture is driven by supported rollup stacks, DA configuration, sequencing needs and infrastructure capacity. Pricing & cost structure can vary by deployment and should be assessed based on throughput, infrastructure and support requirements.

Gateway.fm Features, Pros & Cons

Features	Details
Modular Infrastructure	Gateway.fm focuses on modular blockchain infrastructure and managed deployments for teams building dedicated networks.
RaaS Approach	Its RaaS model abstracts infrastructure management so development teams do not have to build the entire operational environment themselves.
Appchain Support	Suitable for application-specific blockchain deployments where teams need greater control than simply deploying a smart contract on an existing chain.
Infrastructure Management	Helps handle operational infrastructure associated with running a production blockchain network.
Customization	Projects can evaluate network architecture and infrastructure according to their performance and application requirements.
Enterprise Use	Its infrastructure approach can suit organizations requiring managed blockchain operations.

Pros	Cons
Modular infrastructure approach	Exact stack availability should be confirmed for each deployment
Focus on managed blockchain infrastructure	Less recognizable to some developers than larger infrastructure providers
Suitable for application-specific chains	Custom architectures can require deeper technical planning
Production-oriented infrastructure	Pricing may depend heavily on configuration
Reduces DevOps burden	Teams still need to manage application-level responsibilities

10. Ankr AppChains

Founded in 2017, Ankr provides blockchain infrastructure and its AppChains offering for projects that want customizable application-specific networks. Its L2/L3 support can cover rollup and appchain architectures, with infrastructure to help deploy and operate nodes on an ongoing basis.

Ankr’s extensive ecosystem consists of RPC, node infrastructure and developer services that can be leveraged to augment an application-specific chain. The managed infrastructure makes it easy to deploy, as teams don’t have to run each node component themselves.

The Supported rollup stacks are determined by the chosen AppChain architecture and integrations available. Pricing & cost structure usage and infrastructure dependent. Ankr has a number of usage-based pricing models for its infrastructure services, but larger deployments can opt for subscription or custom agreements.

Ankr AppChains Features, Pros & Cons

Features	Details
AppChain Infrastructure	Ankr AppChains is designed to help projects create dedicated application-specific blockchain environments using managed infrastructure.
Blockchain Infrastructure	Benefits from Ankr’s broader node, RPC, and Web3 infrastructure ecosystem.
Custom Networks	AppChain deployments can be configured around the requirements of specific applications and ecosystems.
Node Management	Ankr’s infrastructure background helps reduce the operational requirements associated with maintaining blockchain nodes.
Developer Infrastructure	RPC and infrastructure services can complement applications operating their own dedicated chain.
Deployment Model	Designed to simplify application-chain creation compared with independently building and maintaining all infrastructure components.

Pros	Cons
Strong underlying node infrastructure	AppChain and RaaS capabilities should not be confused with general RPC services
Dedicated application-chain approach	Exact architecture depends on selected deployment model
Managed infrastructure	Custom requirements may require provider support
Broad Web3 infrastructure ecosystem	Advanced rollup requirements need careful technical evaluation
Useful for application-specific networks	Pricing and infrastructure costs depend on network requirements

Conclusion

Rollup-as-a-Service platforms lower the barrier to entry for developers, protocols, enterprises and Web3 apps to deploy their own custom L2 and L3 networks without having to build all the infrastructure pieces themselves from scratch.

The right choice will depend on the supported rollup stacks, data availability, sequencer architecture, ease of deployment, security, customizability, ecosystem integrations, and overall operating costs. Caldera, Conduit, AltLayer, Gelato, Alchemy Rollups, Zeeve, Chainstack, QuickNode Rollups, Gateway.fm and Ankr AppChains all deploy blockchains differently.

Before choosing a provider, teams should evaluate technical flexibility, long-term scalability, infrastructure ownership, vendor lock-in, quality of support, and pricing structure to ensure the platform meets their application’s needs.

FAQ